header-logo header-logo

11 September 2015 / Brie Stevens-Hoare KC
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Home & away

nlj_7667_brie-stevens-hoare

Brie Stevens-Hoare QC considers adult children, charities & state benefits in the wake of the Ilott decision

Adult children and how to deal them, or at least their claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) 1975, has been a vexed topic for 25 years. Has it finally been resolved by the Court of Appeal in the second decision in Ilott v Mitson [2015] EWCA Civ 797, [2015] All ER (D) 290 (Jul)?

The 1938 predecessor legislation allowed children under 21 or subject to a physical or mental disability to apply. Parliament elected in the 1975 legislation to include all children without distinction. However it seemed for a long time the old distinctions survived. The Coventry decision in 1980 was frequently used to argue adult children had additional hurdles to clear. The Court of Appeal has been consistent in saying that legally the position of adult children is no different to that of other applicants; see Re Hancock (dec’d) [1993] 1 FCR 500, Espinosa v Bourke [1999] 3 FCR 76 and the first Ilott

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll