header-logo header-logo

Home & away

11 September 2015 / Brie Stevens-Hoare KC
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail
nlj_7667_brie-stevens-hoare

Brie Stevens-Hoare QC considers adult children, charities & state benefits in the wake of the Ilott decision

Adult children and how to deal them, or at least their claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) 1975, has been a vexed topic for 25 years. Has it finally been resolved by the Court of Appeal in the second decision in Ilott v Mitson [2015] EWCA Civ 797, [2015] All ER (D) 290 (Jul)?

The 1938 predecessor legislation allowed children under 21 or subject to a physical or mental disability to apply. Parliament elected in the 1975 legislation to include all children without distinction. However it seemed for a long time the old distinctions survived. The Coventry decision in 1980 was frequently used to argue adult children had additional hurdles to clear. The Court of Appeal has been consistent in saying that legally the position of adult children is no different to that of other applicants; see Re Hancock (dec’d) [1993] 1 FCR 500, Espinosa v Bourke [1999] 3 FCR 76 and the first Ilott

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll