header-logo header-logo

Homeland marriages

02 May 2025 / John Mayberry , Affifa Farrukh
Issue: 8114 / Categories: Features , Profession , Family , International
printer mail-detail
217261
Affifa Farrukh & John F Mayberry examine the research on homeland marriages originating in Pakistan & protecting vulnerable people
  • Examines the motives of Pakistani families who seek homeland marriages for their children, considering relevant cases that have come before the UK courts, including in relation to breaches of forced marriage protection orders.

There is an urban myth that many Pakistani families will seek a homeland marriage for their children in the belief that the spouse will have a more reliable religious background than that of a potential Muslim partner from the West. Parents may have believed spouses brought from Pakistan would be more traditional, religious, hardworking and family-oriented. However, in practice, Pakistani society does not reflect strict adherence to Islamic values.

Another justification for these marriages is the need to maintain family unity. That reasoning fails to recognise that the Pakistani community of the UK exceeds 1.6 million, making up 2.5% of the population. The true underlying reason may, therefore, be that such a marriage opens the route to successful

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll