header-logo header-logo

Homeland marriages

02 May 2025 / John Mayberry , Affifa Farrukh
Issue: 8114 / Categories: Features , Profession , Family , International
printer mail-detail
217261
Affifa Farrukh & John F Mayberry examine the research on homeland marriages originating in Pakistan & protecting vulnerable people
  • Examines the motives of Pakistani families who seek homeland marriages for their children, considering relevant cases that have come before the UK courts, including in relation to breaches of forced marriage protection orders.

There is an urban myth that many Pakistani families will seek a homeland marriage for their children in the belief that the spouse will have a more reliable religious background than that of a potential Muslim partner from the West. Parents may have believed spouses brought from Pakistan would be more traditional, religious, hardworking and family-oriented. However, in practice, Pakistani society does not reflect strict adherence to Islamic values.

Another justification for these marriages is the need to maintain family unity. That reasoning fails to recognise that the Pakistani community of the UK exceeds 1.6 million, making up 2.5% of the population. The true underlying reason may, therefore, be that such a marriage opens the route to successful

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll