header-logo header-logo

29 November 2018 / Alec Samuels
Issue: 7819 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Homicide: loss of control

Alec Samuels explores a defence that can reduce murder to manslaughter

  • Covers a range of approaches to the partial defence of loss of control.

Charged with murder, the defendant D pleads loss of control, manslaughter: a partial defence introduced in 2010 by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009, ss 54-55. The basic criterion is normality, a person of D’s sex and age with a normal degree of tolerance and self-restraint might have reacted in the same or in a similar way to D. How would the juror have expected the average man in the street to have reacted? That is the objective approach. The ordinary average phlegmatic Englishman might get upset and angry but he does not normally ‘lose his cool’ and resort to killing. Therefore, the defendant raising loss of control is often something of an ‘odd ball’, a bit eccentric. However, the law does recognise the relevance of the circumstances of D. D may meet the requirements of the qualifying trigger. He might have feared extreme violence from the victim

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll