header-logo header-logo

06 December 2007 / Timothy Pitt-payne
Issue: 7300 / Categories: Features , Data protection
printer mail-detail

Honey, I shrunk the database

Timothy Pitt-Payne considers the legal implications
of the HMRC data disaster

“To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks like carelessness.” And to lose every parent in the country? Even Oscar Wilde’s Lady Bracknell might be left speechless.

On 20 November 2007 the chancellor of the exchequer made a statement to the House of Commons about what he described as “an extremely serious failure” at HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC). In October 2007 a junior official at HMRC sent two CDs to the National Audit Office (NAO) by courier. The disks contained a full copy of HMRC’s child benefits database, including names, addresses, dates of birth, national insurance numbers, and bank and building society account details. There was information about 25 million individuals. The disks were password protected but not encrypted, and the package in which they were sent was neither registered nor recorded. The CDs did not arrive at the NAO. For the past few weeks, every family claiming child benefit has been left wondering if

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll