header-logo header-logo

23 January 2020 / Dr Ping-fat Sze
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Hong Kong’s anti-mask law: what next?

14636
Dr Ping-fat Sze comments on the Hong Kong court’s compromise on the criminalisation of protest & shares his concerns about the rule of law & the future of justice

The administration of justice in Hong Kong has again hit the international headlines at the end of 2019 with the High Court suspending its earlier decision that the anti-mask law made by the Chief Executive in Council was unconstitutional and thus inoperative.

Anti-mask law

With the persistent street demonstrations, the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation was made on 4 October 2019, pursuant to the Emergency Regulations Ordinance 1922. It created a criminal offence, punishable by a fine or imprisonment, for any person wearing a mask in public assemblies (other than for medical, religious or occupational purposes) or refusing to remove it on demand. These provisions were said to be necessary for effective law enforcement.

Upon judicial review, however, this regulation (absent the sanction of the Legislative Council) was held incompatible with the Basic Law. The measures were also deemed unnecessary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll