header-logo header-logo

23 January 2020 / Dr Ping-fat Sze
Issue: 7871 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Hong Kong’s anti-mask law: what next?

14636
Dr Ping-fat Sze comments on the Hong Kong court’s compromise on the criminalisation of protest & shares his concerns about the rule of law & the future of justice

The administration of justice in Hong Kong has again hit the international headlines at the end of 2019 with the High Court suspending its earlier decision that the anti-mask law made by the Chief Executive in Council was unconstitutional and thus inoperative.

Anti-mask law

With the persistent street demonstrations, the Prohibition on Face Covering Regulation was made on 4 October 2019, pursuant to the Emergency Regulations Ordinance 1922. It created a criminal offence, punishable by a fine or imprisonment, for any person wearing a mask in public assemblies (other than for medical, religious or occupational purposes) or refusing to remove it on demand. These provisions were said to be necessary for effective law enforcement.

Upon judicial review, however, this regulation (absent the sanction of the Legislative Council) was held incompatible with the Basic Law. The measures were also deemed unnecessary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll