header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 September 2009 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Profession , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Hope springs eternal?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Louis Flannery examines cases of alleged solicitor negligence

Hope springs eternal: man is ever-optimistic, or so thought Pope in 1733 in his Essay on Man. As solicitors, we all try to be as optimistic in our advice to clients as we can. Nevertheless, be careful: the dangers of being over-optimistic in the context of legal advice were spelled out earlier this year in a case involving a magic circle firm advising clients in relation to a substantial and complex dispute.
 

No solicitor goes out of their way to be negligent: being sued by a client can never be a pleasant experience. Although solicitors’ negligence cases usually arise from transactional work, in the litigation field the most common cause for complaint is a failure to issue or serve proceedings before the expiry of the relevant limitation period. In 2004, the Court of Appeal delivered its judgment in the case of Dixon v Clement Jones, a case of solicitor negligence involving a failure to issue proceedings in time, in a “loss of chance” case:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: When post-breach events rewrite damages claims
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
NLJ this week: Supreme Court redraws unfair prejudice rules
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
NLJ this week: ‘Joe Donor’ ruling exposes dangers of unregulated conception
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: CILEX warns Mazur ruling must spark reform
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
NLJ this week: Conditional job offers carry hidden risks for employers
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll