header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 September 2009 / Louis Flannery KC
Issue: 7383 / Categories: Features , Profession , Professional negligence
printer mail-detail

Hope springs eternal?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Louis Flannery examines cases of alleged solicitor negligence

Hope springs eternal: man is ever-optimistic, or so thought Pope in 1733 in his Essay on Man. As solicitors, we all try to be as optimistic in our advice to clients as we can. Nevertheless, be careful: the dangers of being over-optimistic in the context of legal advice were spelled out earlier this year in a case involving a magic circle firm advising clients in relation to a substantial and complex dispute.
 

No solicitor goes out of their way to be negligent: being sued by a client can never be a pleasant experience. Although solicitors’ negligence cases usually arise from transactional work, in the litigation field the most common cause for complaint is a failure to issue or serve proceedings before the expiry of the relevant limitation period. In 2004, the Court of Appeal delivered its judgment in the case of Dixon v Clement Jones, a case of solicitor negligence involving a failure to issue proceedings in time, in a “loss of chance” case:

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll