header-logo header-logo

28 June 2007
Issue: 7279 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

In-house lawyer positions on the rise

More company lawyers are being hired, while a third of outside counsel are to be fired, according to an in-house counsel study.

In the eighth annual Chief Legal Officer Survey, Altman Weil and LexisNexis report that 40% of chief legal officers (CLOs) in the US plan to hire in the next year, up from 36% last year, with specialist attorneys in greatest demand.
Law departments have added an average extra 1.7 new positions in the last two to three years—triple that reported in the 2006 survey. In the coming year, 18% of law departments plan to increase their use of outside counsel, up from 14% last year.

However, nearly a third of CLOs have fired or are considering firing at least one of their outside law firms this year. This is slightly up on last year’s 30% of CLOs firing, but is well below previous years where the figure scaled 50%–60%. Grievances included “poor quality legal work”, “lack of responsiveness” and “cost management issues”.

Those outside firms worried about their future should note that “improved communication” was the top response among CLOs when asked how outside counsel had improved their working relationship with the law department. Reduced fees, better budgeting and improved billing practices ranked second.

Compliance has been the top concern for CLOs in each survey since 2003, and topped the list again this year.

Issue: 7279 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll