header-logo header-logo

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Fees
printer mail-detail

In-house lawyers demand move from hourly billing

News

Two-thirds of in-house counsel would pay higher fees for high value work if they were charged less for low value work, research shows.

The new research—Stop the Clock?—by the C&I Group and BDO Stoy Hayward shows that while most practising lawyers use the hourly billing system, there is a growing demand for other options.

Deepak Malhotra, C&I Group London region chairman, says: “If in-house counsel and law firms are to explore a new approach to billing it has to be within a climate of trust. The survey proves that now is a unique time where both parties are willing to discuss fees in a transparent manner.”

The survey of 171 C&I Group members reveals that 97% of in-house counsel have used hourly billing in the last 12 months, although it rated lowest in terms of satisfaction of current billing methods.

The most popular alternative to hourly fees is having a menu-style approach, allowing in-house counsel to pick the most preferred billing method that best suits the particular job—47% chose this as the current best option.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll