header-logo header-logo

In-house lawyers demand move from hourly billing

04 October 2007
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Fees
printer mail-detail

News

Two-thirds of in-house counsel would pay higher fees for high value work if they were charged less for low value work, research shows.

The new research—Stop the Clock?—by the C&I Group and BDO Stoy Hayward shows that while most practising lawyers use the hourly billing system, there is a growing demand for other options.

Deepak Malhotra, C&I Group London region chairman, says: “If in-house counsel and law firms are to explore a new approach to billing it has to be within a climate of trust. The survey proves that now is a unique time where both parties are willing to discuss fees in a transparent manner.”

The survey of 171 C&I Group members reveals that 97% of in-house counsel have used hourly billing in the last 12 months, although it rated lowest in terms of satisfaction of current billing methods.

The most popular alternative to hourly fees is having a menu-style approach, allowing in-house counsel to pick the most preferred billing method that best suits the particular job—47% chose this as the current best option.

Issue: 7291 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Fees
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll