header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 June 2016 / Dr Marc K Peter
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail

In-house legal technology: Smart investments (Pt 3)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
nlj_7703_peter

Embracing technology can help in-house counsel focus on profitable growth & future-proofing, explains Dr Marc K Peter

 

It is no secret for those working in the sector that in-house counsel are under more pressure than ever to perform more duties with comparably fewer resources. And with warnings that there may be a downturn in the global economy of a severity to rival the crash of 2008 and the possibility of a Brexit, in-house lawyers need to proactively embrace advantages provided by innovation and technology to ensure they and their businesses prosper in what could be a stormy economic and political future.

Twenty percent of the legal profession now work in-house—a figure that has doubled in the past 10 years (Annual Statistics Report 2015, Law Society). It is clear that in-house counsel exert enormous influence on both the commercial and legal landscape in the UK. After all, it is they who instruct most of the lucrative commercial work enjoyed by the top 100 law firms,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll