header-logo header-logo

In-house legal technology: Smart investments (Pt 3)

17 June 2016 / Dr Marc K Peter
Issue: 7703 / Categories: Features , Brexit , Profession , Technology
printer mail-detail
nlj_7703_peter

Embracing technology can help in-house counsel focus on profitable growth & future-proofing, explains Dr Marc K Peter

 

It is no secret for those working in the sector that in-house counsel are under more pressure than ever to perform more duties with comparably fewer resources. And with warnings that there may be a downturn in the global economy of a severity to rival the crash of 2008 and the possibility of a Brexit, in-house lawyers need to proactively embrace advantages provided by innovation and technology to ensure they and their businesses prosper in what could be a stormy economic and political future.

Twenty percent of the legal profession now work in-house—a figure that has doubled in the past 10 years (Annual Statistics Report 2015, Law Society). It is clear that in-house counsel exert enormous influence on both the commercial and legal landscape in the UK. After all, it is they who instruct most of the lucrative commercial work enjoyed by the top 100 law firms,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll