header-logo header-logo

Housing

03 February 2011
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Yemshaw v Hounslow London Borough Council [2011] UKSC 3, [2011] All ER (D) 187 (Jan)

The definition of “domestic violence” for the purposes of s 177(1) of the Housing Act 1996 included physical violence, threatening or intimidating behaviour, and any other form of abuse which, directly or indirectly, might give rise to the risk of harm. “Physical violence” was not the only natural meaning of the word “violence”. It was commonplace to speak of the violence of a person’s language or of a person’s feelings. When used as an adjective it could refer to a range of behaviours falling short of physical contact with the person. By the time of the Act, the understanding of domestic violence had moved on from a narrow focus upon battered wives and physical contact. Even if that were wrong, there was no doubt that it had moved on since.

The courts recognised that, where Parliament used a word such as “violence”, the factual circumstances to which it applied could develop and change over the years. Although it was impermissible to construe the meaning

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll