header-logo header-logo

Housing law scheme to prevent eviction

09 August 2023
Issue: 8037 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Housing
printer mail-detail
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has set up a scheme to provide free legal advice to families facing eviction or repossession

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has set up a scheme to provide free legal advice to families facing eviction or repossession

Under the Housing Loss Prevention Advice Service (HLPAS), launched last week, advice will be available from the moment a written notice is received by a tenant or homeowner. The advice might cover, for example, illegal eviction, disrepair and housing conditions, rent or mortgage arrears, benefits payments and debt. Free legal representation will be provided if the matter goes to court, regardless of the individual’s financial circumstances.

The MoJ said an extra £10m funding would be provided with the aim of helping 38,000 people a year.

Justice minister Lord Bellamy said: ‘Having access to the right legal advice at the earliest point possible is crucial for those who face losing their home.’

Legal aid was withdrawn a decade ago from housing issues, except homelessness, by LASPO (the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012).

Law Society President Lubna Shuja said: ‘In principle we support the HLPAS.

‘It is also a welcome recognition of the value of early advice and the need to address a client’s problems holistically. We cannot underestimate the value of early legal advice as it can help address problems before they escalate, preventing cases from going to court unnecessarily.

‘However, we have continuing concerns as to whether the system will be effective, and about the increasing legal aid advice deserts caused by long-term underfunding of the system. The scheme is provided by solicitors and therefore contingent on the number of solicitors able to do the work. With rising legal aid advice deserts, there are fewer and fewer legal aid practitioners able to give legal advice.

‘Those facing eviction will not be able to access vital legal advice if there is no legal advice provider in their area.’

 

Issue: 8037 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus , Housing
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll