header-logo header-logo

How to avoid getting into serious trouble!

18 September 2013 / HH Judge Simon Brown KC
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

HH Simon Brown QC continues his exclusive NLJ online series on costs management post-Jackson

Civil litigation lawyers who have recently returned from their well-earned long vacation will have been stunned to read their LexisNexis alert about the “Plebgate” libel case involving Andrew Mitchell MP and News Group Newspapers.

At the case management conference (CMC) at the beginning of the long vacation, Master McCloud ruled that Mr Mitchell will only recover his court fees of £2,000 in costs from the defendants if he is successful in his £150,000 (maximum) libel action against them and will, therefore, have to bear his own lawyer’s costs of £500,000 leaving him (or perhaps them) £348,000 out of pocket.

This will, no doubt, strike experienced returnees as bizarrely unfair, but how did it happen? Quite simply, he and his solicitors had failed comply with the rules (CPR 3.13) and an order made about the filing his costs budget about costs budgeting.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll