header-logo header-logo

18 September 2013 / HH Judge Simon Brown KC
Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs , Budgeting
printer mail-detail

How to avoid getting into serious trouble!

HH Simon Brown QC continues his exclusive NLJ online series on costs management post-Jackson

Civil litigation lawyers who have recently returned from their well-earned long vacation will have been stunned to read their LexisNexis alert about the “Plebgate” libel case involving Andrew Mitchell MP and News Group Newspapers.

At the case management conference (CMC) at the beginning of the long vacation, Master McCloud ruled that Mr Mitchell will only recover his court fees of £2,000 in costs from the defendants if he is successful in his £150,000 (maximum) libel action against them and will, therefore, have to bear his own lawyer’s costs of £500,000 leaving him (or perhaps them) £348,000 out of pocket.

This will, no doubt, strike experienced returnees as bizarrely unfair, but how did it happen? Quite simply, he and his solicitors had failed comply with the rules (CPR 3.13) and an order made about the filing his costs budget about costs budgeting.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll