header-logo header-logo

How certain is death?

26 March 2009 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Seamus Burns welcomes an attempt to prevent the wrongful diagnosis of death

Benjamin Franklin famously said there were only two certainties in life, namely death and taxation.

The recent publication by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, A Code of Practice for the Diagnosis and Confirmation of Death, represents the medical profession's latest attempt to nail down and clarify when it is appropriate to diagnose and confirm when someone is dead.

The code is designed to remove ambiguities in the way death was diagnosed in the earlier 1998 code and to take cognisance of the technological innovations in medical practice in the last decade. Arguably, too it seeks to address the horror stories (anecdotal in some cases) of patients diagnosed as dead by doctors, allegedly coming back from the dead. Indeed the BBC, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 revealed last year that patients in five English hospitals had been incorrectly diagnosed as being dead over the past five years.

Dr Jan Bondeson, Professor of Rheumatology at Cardiff University, is concerned that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll