header-logo header-logo

26 March 2009 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

How certain is death?

Seamus Burns welcomes an attempt to prevent the wrongful diagnosis of death

Benjamin Franklin famously said there were only two certainties in life, namely death and taxation.

The recent publication by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, A Code of Practice for the Diagnosis and Confirmation of Death, represents the medical profession's latest attempt to nail down and clarify when it is appropriate to diagnose and confirm when someone is dead.

The code is designed to remove ambiguities in the way death was diagnosed in the earlier 1998 code and to take cognisance of the technological innovations in medical practice in the last decade. Arguably, too it seeks to address the horror stories (anecdotal in some cases) of patients diagnosed as dead by doctors, allegedly coming back from the dead. Indeed the BBC, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 revealed last year that patients in five English hospitals had been incorrectly diagnosed as being dead over the past five years.

Dr Jan Bondeson, Professor of Rheumatology at Cardiff University, is concerned that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Gateley Legal—Caroline Pope & Bob Maynard

Construction team bolstered by hire of senior consultant duo

Switalskis—four appointments

Switalskis—four appointments

Firm expands residential conveyancing team with quadruple appointment

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

mfg Solicitors—Claire Pope

Private client team welcomes senior associatein Worcester

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll