header-logo header-logo

How certain is death?

26 March 2009 / Seamus Burns
Issue: 7362 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Seamus Burns welcomes an attempt to prevent the wrongful diagnosis of death

Benjamin Franklin famously said there were only two certainties in life, namely death and taxation.

The recent publication by the Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, A Code of Practice for the Diagnosis and Confirmation of Death, represents the medical profession's latest attempt to nail down and clarify when it is appropriate to diagnose and confirm when someone is dead.

The code is designed to remove ambiguities in the way death was diagnosed in the earlier 1998 code and to take cognisance of the technological innovations in medical practice in the last decade. Arguably, too it seeks to address the horror stories (anecdotal in some cases) of patients diagnosed as dead by doctors, allegedly coming back from the dead. Indeed the BBC, under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 revealed last year that patients in five English hospitals had been incorrectly diagnosed as being dead over the past five years.

Dr Jan Bondeson, Professor of Rheumatology at Cardiff University, is concerned that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll