header-logo header-logo

08 May 2026 / Vanessa Friend , Robert Jackson
Issue: 8160 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Jurisdiction , International
printer mail-detail

How not to enforce a nuptial agreement

248999
© Getty images
Vanessa Friend & Robert Jackson examine Timokhin v Timokhina & the dangers of jurisdiction
  • English courts may give effect to a nuptial agreement that complies with the principles set out in Radmacher v Granatino when deciding ancillary relief.
  • However, if they are not deciding ancillary relief, English courts have neither the obligation nor jurisdiction to determine whether a nuptial agreement is fair and to make or refuse financial awards accordingly.
  • Where a foreign nuptial agreement is in dispute, and a claimant brings a debt claim to enforce its terms, a defendant should seriously consider commencing Part III proceedings in the Family Division of the High Court or the Family Court in response.

In the recent case of Timokhin v Timokhina [2026] EWHC 439 (KB), the claimant, Alexander Timokhin, and the defendant, Anna Timokhina, are Russian nationals who married in 2004. They signed a prenuptial agreement (PNA) in June 2017 and separated in July 2017. They have two children. They were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll