header-logo header-logo

25 November 2022 / Sarah Hughes , Victoria Rylatt
Issue: 8004 / Categories: Features , Family , Child law , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

How to approach fact-finding hearings

101340
Sarah Hughes & Victoria Rylatt set out recent case law on fact-finding hearings in private children proceedings
  • The key cases this year which have addressed case management issues and the correct approach towards fact-finding hearings, as well as the guidance provided by the president of the Family Division to judges and magistrates on this subject.

There have been a number of judgments published this year which have grappled with difficult issues relating to fact-finding hearings. These have provided extremely useful guidance, building on the important decision in Re H-N and others [2021] EWCA Civ 448, [2021] All ER (D) 11 (Apr).

In this article (Part 1) we will examine the key cases which have addressed case management issues and the correct approach towards fact-finding hearings this year, together with the president’s recent guidance on the same. In Part 2 we will examine specific issues which have arisen in recent fact-finding hearings—namely the use of intimate images, publication and disclosure.

K v K

K v K

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll