header-logo header-logo

28 October 2022 / Rakesh Kapila
Issue: 8000 / Categories: Features , Profession , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

How to choose a forensic accountant

Rakesh Kapila considers various issues which should be taken into account in deciding whether a forensic accountant is needed and subsequently in choosing an expert
  • Is a forensic accountant required?
  • General qualities and specific factors in choosing a forensic accountant.

Forensic accountants examine and report on the financial aspects of legal claims and disputes and play an important role in many types of litigation. The specialism has grown over the years and there is a choice of firms for solicitors and others seeking financial input on claims and disputes.

This article highlights various issues which should be considered in deciding whether a forensic accountant is needed and subsequently in choosing an expert. Although forensic accountants are often engaged as advisers, this article considers their involvement as experts.

Is the work needed typically undertaken by forensic accountants?

It is likely that forensic accountants will be required in relation to business valuations, including valuations of unlisted companies, which may be needed in matrimonial disputes and disputes between shareholders.

Expert accountancy

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll