header-logo header-logo

HRA 1998: here to stay?

14 October 2011 / Stephen Hockman
Issue: 7485 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Stephen Hockman QC considers the future of human rights in the UK

At the Lib Dem conference last month, the Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg, last month declared that “the Human Rights Act is here to stay”. He was quickly contradicted by Home Secretary Teresa May, who told the Tory conference she wanted rid of it, or at least parts of it. This pronouncement came as a result of May’s erroneous claim that a judge had ruled an illegal immigrant could not be deported because he had a pet cat. And so began “catgate”. So what’s really happening?

In early September, the justice secretary Kenneth Clarke, told Parliament he welcomed advice received privately in July 2011 from the government’s Commission on a Bill of Rights (CBR).

If implemented in full, this advice would require amendment of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), the repositioning of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) as a remote and reflective source of occasional jurisprudential garnish, rather than a route to substantive redress for

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll