header-logo header-logo

Human rights

18 July 2013
Issue: 7569 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Adesina and others) v Nursing and Midwifery Council [2013] EWCA Civ 818, [2013] All ER (D) 112 (Jul)

The claimants were both nurses who had sought to bring an appeal against a disciplinary decision of the defendant Nursing and Midwifery Council (the NMC) under Art 29(9) of the Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001 (SI 2002/253). Both claimants sought to appeal outside of the 28 day time limit set out in the Order. The judge held that both claimants’ appeals were time-barred. The claimants appealed. The Court of Appeal held that it was established law that where a right of appeal was provided, it had to be compliant with Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and that the rights enshrined in Art 6 might be subject to limitations but such limitations were not to restrict or reduce the access left to the individual in such a way or to such an extent that the very essence of the right was impaired. Although there were differences between extradition appeals and appeals in disciplinary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll