header-logo header-logo

Human rights

09 December 2016
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of K and others) v Secretary of State for Defence and another [2016] EWCA Civ 1149, [2016] All ER (D) 133 (Nov)

The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal of three Afghan nationals who had brought proceedings on the basis that they had worked for the defendant secretaries of state as covert human intelligence sources. The Divisional Court had, in earlier proceedings, refused the claimants’ application for further disclosure on the ground that the claims relied on by the claimants had not engaged art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights. The Court of Appeal held that the Divisional Court had erred in that the resolution of the claimants’ public law claim constituted a determination of their “civil rights”, within the meaning of Art 6 of the Convention and, accordingly, fell within the ambit of the Justice and Security Act 2013. Accordingly, the court held that there would have to be such disclosure as was necessary for the claimants to have the fair hearing to which Art 6 entitled them, and that, if

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll