header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 166, Issue 7726

09 December 2016
IN THIS ISSUE

Clare Arthurs & Richard Marshall share an (almost) A-Z of cross border disputes, post-Brexit

John McMullen discusses TUPE & service provision change disputes

In a second in a series of articles, Frank Maher advises upon how to discover rogue partners & employees

Qader and others v Esure Services Ltd; Khan and another v McGee [2016] EWCA Civ 1109, [2016] All ER (D) 156 (Nov)

Athelstane Aamodt examines the new CPS guidance on cases involving communications sent via social media

 

Jon Holland & Catherine Robert forecast the implications of Brexit for financial crime regulation

Azur Space Solar Power GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office T-614/15 , [2016] All ER (D) 14 (Dec)

R (on the application of K and others) v Secretary of State for Defence and another [2016] EWCA Civ 1149, [2016] All ER (D) 133 (Nov)

Jonathan Pickworth & Jonah Anderson examine the proposed unexplained wealth order regime

 

Hamilton v Kuoni Travel Ltd [2016] EWHC 3090 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 13 (Dec)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—William Hallett & Lorna Scully

Anthony Collins—William Hallett & Lorna Scully

Anthony Collins hires two talented legal directors

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll