header-logo header-logo

Show me the money

09 December 2016 / Jonah Anderson , Jonathan Pickworth
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Features , Charities , Commercial
printer mail-detail
nlj_7726_pickworth2jpg

Jonathan Pickworth & Jonah Anderson examine the proposed unexplained wealth order regime

 
  • Anti-money laundering law and regulation in the UK increasingly focuses on overseas politically exposed persons (PEPs).
  • The new Criminal Finances Bill proposes to introduce the “unexplained wealth order” (UWO), a civil investigative order.
  • A UWO will enable UK law enforcement to question PEPs regarding their wealth and allow civil recovery proceedings against their assets, even when there is no proof that the wealth in question is the proceeds of criminal activity.

The existing anti-money laundering (AML) law contains a civil recovery regime under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 which creates a non-conviction based asset recovery regime. This regime allows law enforcement to recover property which is, or which represents, property obtained through unlawful conduct. However, under the law as it currently stands, a claim for civil recovery cannot be sustained solely on the basis that a defendant had no identifiable lawful income to warrant their lifestyle and purchases, as set out in Director of the Assets Recovery Agency

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll