header-logo header-logo

​Safety in numbers?

09 December 2016 / Catherine Robert , Jon Holland
Issue: 7726 / Categories: Features , Brexit , EU , Criminal
printer mail-detail
nlj_7726_holland

Jon Holland & Catherine Robert forecast the implications of Brexit for financial crime regulation

  • Brexit is likely to have a significant impact on the UK’s financial sanctions regime, a low impact on the anti-money laundering regime and no impact on anti-bribery measures.

Much of the UK’s financial crime legislation is derived from European law and international initiatives. This article looks at the changes, advantages and problems which we may encounter post-Brexit.

At present, it is not clear what form Brexit will take, but we have assumed that the government’s Great Repeal Bill will be passed and that it will repeal the European Communities Act 1972. If that’s right, Brexit will not have an immediate impact on financial crime regulation because all pre-Brexit EU law will be transposed into domestic law while the government decides whether to repeal, amend or keep it, but this article considers the longer-term implications.

In summary, the biggest impact is likely to be felt in relation to financial sanctions, where the government will need to re-consider the legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll