header-logo header-logo

21 June 2006
Issue: 7278 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Human Rights Act applies to British troops abroad

British troops holding prisoners overseas are bound by the Human Rights Act 1998 (HRA 1998), the House of Lords has ruled, in a case being hailed as historic by civil rights campaigners.

In R (on the application of Al-Skeini) v Secretary of State for Defence—which arose from complaints against the UK about the deaths of six Iraqi civilians—the Law Lords ruled by a four to one majority that HRA 1998 applied overseas, including detention centres over which British troops had “effective control”.

The case was brought after Baha Mousa, a hotel receptionist, died while in British custody in 2003. He was allegedly tortured for over 36 hours while detained by British troops in Basra. A post-mortem examination revealed 93 separate injuries on his body.

The Law Lords ruled that Mousa’s family is entitled to an independent, impartial and thorough investigation into the circumstances surrounding his death. The government is likely to be forced to conduct an independent inquiry.

Although welcoming this aspect of the ruling, a spokesperson for Amnesty International says the group regrets that the Law Lords threw out the appeals of the other five Iraqis who were allegedly shot by British troops, ruling that HRA 1998 did not apply to their deaths.

Phil Shiner, the solicitor acting for Mousa’s family, called the ruling a “massive breakthrough” in his clients’ “efforts to secure accountability for deaths and torture in detention”. He now plans to go for “huge exemplary damages” for about 20 other Iraqi families with allegations of mistreatment by British soldiers.

Attorney General Lord Goldsmith says: “It is of the greatest importance that detainees in British custody are not mistreated by our armed forces in any way.”

Issue: 7278 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll