header-logo header-logo

29 March 2018 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Human rights & Brexit

nlj_7787_bindman

What safeguards for human rights post-Brexit? Geoffrey Bindman reports

It is not easy to forecast the impact of our departure from the EU on human rights. Our adherence to the European Convention on Human Rights is not directly affected because the Convention emanates not from the EU but the Council of Europe, of which our membership continues. Likewise the Human Rights Act 1998 is, and will remain, binding UK legislation—unless or until repealed by the UK parliament. And those safeguards for human rights already established in the common law from Magna Carta onwards will not be reduced.

However, one important human rights instrument, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, binds us currently as an EU member. In the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill now being debated by a committee of the whole House of Commons, the government proposes (cl 3(1)) that ‘direct EU legislation, so far as operative immediately before exit day, forms part of domestic law on or after exit day’. However, the Bill proposes certain exceptions, among which is clause 5(4): ‘The Charter

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll