header-logo header-logo

29 March 2018 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7787 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Human rights & Brexit

nlj_7787_bindman

What safeguards for human rights post-Brexit? Geoffrey Bindman reports

It is not easy to forecast the impact of our departure from the EU on human rights. Our adherence to the European Convention on Human Rights is not directly affected because the Convention emanates not from the EU but the Council of Europe, of which our membership continues. Likewise the Human Rights Act 1998 is, and will remain, binding UK legislation—unless or until repealed by the UK parliament. And those safeguards for human rights already established in the common law from Magna Carta onwards will not be reduced.

However, one important human rights instrument, the Charter of Fundamental Rights, binds us currently as an EU member. In the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill now being debated by a committee of the whole House of Commons, the government proposes (cl 3(1)) that ‘direct EU legislation, so far as operative immediately before exit day, forms part of domestic law on or after exit day’. However, the Bill proposes certain exceptions, among which is clause 5(4): ‘The Charter

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll