header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 December 2011
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Human rights—Inhuman or degrading treatment—Effective investigation

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

R (on the application of Mousa) v Secretary of State for Defence and another [2011] EWCA Civ 1334, [2011] ALl ER (D) 160 (Nov)

Court of Appeal, Civil Division, Lord Justice Maurice Kay VP, Sullivan and Pitchford LJJ, 22 Nov 2011

The Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT), set up to investigate allegations of ill-treatment of Iraqi detainees by members of the British armed forces, does not have the requisite independence to comply with the investigatory obligation under Art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

Michael Fordham QC, Dan Squires and Rachel Logan (instructed by Public Interest Lawyers) for the claimant. James Eadie QC, Philip Havers QC and Kate Grange (instructed by the Treasury Solicitor) for the Secretary of State. David Wolfe for the Equality and Human Rights Commission as intervener.

The defendant secretary of state established a team, the Iraq Historic Allegations Team (IHAT), to investigate allegations of ill treatment by members of the British armed forces against detainees in Iraq during the period 2003 to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll