header-logo header-logo

Human rights—Religion—Employment

25 January 2013
Issue: 7545 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Eweida and others v United Kingdom (App. Nos. 48420/10, 59842/10, 51671/10 & 36516/10)

European Court of Human Rights, Judge Thor Bjorgvinsson (president), Judges Bratza, Garlicki, Hirvela, Kalaydjeva, Vucinic and Gaetano, & L Early (section registrar), 4 September & 11 December 2012, 15 February 2013

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has reviewed the application of the right to manifest one’s religion under Art 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights in an employment context. As a general approach, where an individual complains of a restriction on freedom of religion in the workplace, rather than holding that the possibility of changing job would negate any interference with that right, the better approach is to weigh that possibility in the overall balance when considering whether or not the restriction was proportionate. The court has also stressed the margin of appreciation to be afforded to member states in carrying out that balancing exercise, when finding in favour of one applicant who had been precluded from wearing a cross at work, but not in favour of a second

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll