header-logo header-logo

Human rights—Right to liberty and security—Lawfulness of detention

15 September 2011
Issue: 7481 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Castle and others) v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis [2011] EWHC 2317 (Admin), [2011] All ER (D) 34 (Sep)

Queen’s Bench Division, Administrative Court (London), Pitchford LJ and Supperstone J, 8 Sept 2011

The Divisional Court has ruled that the Metropolitan Police’s containment of children during a public demonstration was not been in breach of the force’s duty under s 11 of the Children Act 2004 or any public law duties.

Martin Westgate QC and Ruth Brander (instructed by Bhatt Murphy) for the claimants.
Ivan Hare (instructed by the Metropolitan Police Service) for the defendant.

In November 2010, the defendant police commissioner received notification of a public procession and applications in respect of demonstrations contributing towards a “national student walk out” on 24 November (the event). The defendant’s senior police officers who were responsible for policing major events, were designated as gold, silver or bronze commander depending on their role. On 23 November, the silver commander who was to be in tactical

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll