header-logo header-logo

Human rights—Right to life—Mental health patient

16 February 2012
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Rabone and another v Pennine Care NHS Foundation Trust [2012] UKSC 2, [2012] All ER (D) 59 (Feb)

Supreme Court, Lord Walker, Lady Hale, Lord Brown, Lord Mance and Lord Dyson SCJJ, 8 Feb 2012

The operational obligation under Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) can be owed to a hospital patient who is mentally ill, but who is not detained under the Mental Health Act 1983 (MeHA 1983).

Jenni Richards QC and Nigel Poole (instructed by Pannone LLP) for the claimants. Monica Carss-Frisk QC and Jane Mulcahy (instructed by Hempsons) for the trust. Paul Bowen and Alison Pickup (instructed by Bindmans LLP) for the interveners.

In April 2005, M, the 24-year-old daughter of the claimants, committed suicide. At the time of the suicide, M was on two days’ home leave from hospital, where she was undergoing treatment for a depressive disorder as an informal patient. M had been admitted to the hospital as an emergency following a suicide attempt and was assessed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll