header-logo header-logo

Human rights—Right to life—State’s obligation to investigate death

08 August 2013
Issue: 7572 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

McCaughey and others v United Kingdom (App no 43098/09) [2013] ECHR 43098/09, [2013] All ER (D) 260 (Jul)

European Court of Human Rights, Judges Ineta Ziemele, President, David Thór Björgvinsson, Päivi Hirvelä, George Nicolaou, Zdravka Kalaydjieva, Vincent De Gaetano, Paul Mahoney, 16 Jul 2013

It was an established principle that Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights required investigations to begin promptly and to proceed with reasonable expedition, and that was required quite apart from any question of whether the delay actually impacted on the effectiveness of the investigation.

In October 1990, MM and DG were shot in Northern Ireland by soldiers from a specialist unit of the British Army. The applicants were MM's mother and DG's father and daughter. In April 1993, the Director of Public Prosecutions decided not to prosecute the soldiers involved in the shooting. In 1994 and 1995, the Royal Ulster Constabulary (RUC) forwarded material to the coroner. Over two years went by before the coroner made his first contact with the applicants

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll