header-logo header-logo

28 February 2008 / Susan Nash
Issue: 7310 / Categories: Features , Public , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Human Rights Update

Human Rights

FAMILY LAW

 

Adoption 

In EB v (App No 43546/02) [2007] ECHR 211 (Mar) the applicant alleged that her application to adopt a child was rejected by the French authorities because of her sexual orientation. During the adoption process, she had mentioned her stable relationship with another woman. Relying on Art 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention), which prohibits discrimination, combined with Art 8, which guarantees the right to private and family life, she complained that she suffered discriminatory treatment during the adoption process on account of her choice of lifestyle.

 

The reasons given by the authorities for rejecting her application were the lack of “identificational points of reference” due to the absence of a paternal image, and the ambiguous nature of her partner’s commitment to adoption. The Conseil d’État was satisfied that the decision was based on the interests of an adopted child. noting that French law provided for adoption by single people, the European Court of Human Rights

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll