header-logo header-logo

04 October 2007 / Susan Nash
Issue: 7291 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Human Rights Update

SELF INCRIMINATION >>
ADVERSE Possession >>
INHERITANCE TAX >>
MARGIN OF Appreciation >>

RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT

Relying on Art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) which guarantees the right to a fair trial, the applicants in O’Halloran v United Kingdom (App No 15809/02); Francis v United Kingdom (App No 25624/02), (2007) The Times, 13 July complained that the nature of information sought by a notice of intended prosecution under the 1988 Road Traffic Act (RTA 1988), s 172 violated their right to remain silent and their privilege against self-incrimination. In both cases the applicants’ cars had been caught on speed camera.

As registered keepers of the vehicles they were served notices of an intention to prosecute and asked for the details of the driver on the relevant occasion, or information which would lead to the driver’s identification. Each applicant was further informed that failing to provide information was a criminal offence under RTA 1988, s 172. Although the first applicant admitted that he was the driver, he complained that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll