header-logo header-logo

Human rights & wrongs

14 January 2010 / Professor Susan Nash
Issue: 7400 / Categories: Features , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Professor Susan Nash provides an update on recent human rights cases

The applicant in Zaunegger v Germany (App no 22028/04) complained that the German Civil Code discriminated against unmarried fathers in comparison with divorced fathers. Following the birth of his daughter, the applicant had co-habited with the child’s mother for several years. Before separating, they reached an agreement with the help of the Youth Welfare Office which provided for regular contact with the child.

However, under the German Civil Code, joint custody could only be obtained through a joint declaration, marriage, or a court order which required the consent of each parent. As the mother was not willing to agree on a joint custody declaration, the applicant applied unsuccessfully to the domestic court for a joint custody order.

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) found that by dismissing the applicant’s request for joint custody without examining whether it would be in the child’s interest, the national court had treated him differently from the mother, and from married fathers. In assessing whether

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll