header-logo header-logo

16 October 2008
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

Hunt to set the pace

Profession

Lord Hunt is to head the Law Society’s review of the regulation of the legal profession.

The review, which is expected to last nine months, has been set up to provide recommendations on how to achieve “good, modern regulation of law firms”.

Lord Hunt, a former legal aid minister, says: “The structure of regulation governing lawyers is changing rapidly, as is the legal services market, and it is critically important that the substance of regulation keeps pace.”

Paul Marsh, Law Society president, says Lord Hunt’s legal and regulatory experience is exceptional. “We need to ensure we have an effective regulatory system which protects consumers and the wider public interest and is relevant to the different markets in which firms operate.”

Issue: 7341 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll