header-logo header-logo

01 September 2017 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7759 / Categories: Opinion , Defamation
printer mail-detail

The hunting of the troll

There should be no hiding place for internet trolls, insists Peter Thompson QC

The Rule of Law is under threat from a number of quarters, including the use and abuse of the internet. Its erosive effect can be seen in two of the asides made by Mr Justice Francis in his impeccable judgment in Great Ormond Street Hospital v Yates and Gard [2017] EWHC 1909 (Fam), [2017] All ER (D) 148 (Jul). In an understated reference to worldwide petitions and interventions by heads of state, he observed: ‘A lot of things have been said, particularly in recent days, by those who know almost nothing about the case but who feel entitled to express opinions. Many have been based on feelings rather than facts.’ Later in his judgment he commented on the serious threats and abuse directed at the staff of the applicant hospital. They were, he said, disgraceful.

He did not mention contempt of court in either connection. But that is what was happening: people were deliberating trying to influence the outcome of the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll