header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019 / David Locke
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Media
printer mail-detail

Hyperbole & a mystery ending

9880
David Locke reflects on the impact of the inadequate reporting of Paul Gascoigne’s recent court case

The verdict in the Paul Gascoigne sexual assault trial may be misreported and misunderstood, but it establishes no precedent and must not be allowed to deter women from reporting similar incidents to the police, although sadly that is the likely effect.

On 20 August 2018, Paul Gascoigne kissed a woman on a train, for two or three seconds, without her consent. That much was not contested by the defendant. The woman was already the subject of harassment from other men, so Gascoigne says, albeit there was no corroboration of this. Even if his account is true, nauseatingly he apparently believed that by adding his beer-sodden kiss to the sum total of her harassment he would be doing her a favour. That may be grimly familiar language to many victims of sexual assaults. Such behaviour is not excusable by reference to his childhood traumas or what appears to be his terminal alcohol addiction. Incidentally, although

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll