header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019 / David Locke
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Media
printer mail-detail

Hyperbole & a mystery ending

9880
David Locke reflects on the impact of the inadequate reporting of Paul Gascoigne’s recent court case

The verdict in the Paul Gascoigne sexual assault trial may be misreported and misunderstood, but it establishes no precedent and must not be allowed to deter women from reporting similar incidents to the police, although sadly that is the likely effect.

On 20 August 2018, Paul Gascoigne kissed a woman on a train, for two or three seconds, without her consent. That much was not contested by the defendant. The woman was already the subject of harassment from other men, so Gascoigne says, albeit there was no corroboration of this. Even if his account is true, nauseatingly he apparently believed that by adding his beer-sodden kiss to the sum total of her harassment he would be doing her a favour. That may be grimly familiar language to many victims of sexual assaults. Such behaviour is not excusable by reference to his childhood traumas or what appears to be his terminal alcohol addiction. Incidentally, although

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll