header-logo header-logo

23 October 2019 / David Locke
Issue: 7861 / Categories: Opinion , Criminal , Media
printer mail-detail

Hyperbole & a mystery ending

9880
David Locke reflects on the impact of the inadequate reporting of Paul Gascoigne’s recent court case

The verdict in the Paul Gascoigne sexual assault trial may be misreported and misunderstood, but it establishes no precedent and must not be allowed to deter women from reporting similar incidents to the police, although sadly that is the likely effect.

On 20 August 2018, Paul Gascoigne kissed a woman on a train, for two or three seconds, without her consent. That much was not contested by the defendant. The woman was already the subject of harassment from other men, so Gascoigne says, albeit there was no corroboration of this. Even if his account is true, nauseatingly he apparently believed that by adding his beer-sodden kiss to the sum total of her harassment he would be doing her a favour. That may be grimly familiar language to many victims of sexual assaults. Such behaviour is not excusable by reference to his childhood traumas or what appears to be his terminal alcohol addiction. Incidentally, although

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll