header-logo header-logo

15 September 2016
Issue: 7714 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Hyperlinking copyrighted work lawful if not for profit

Owners of commercial websites face uncertainty following a landmark European Court of Justice (ECJ) decision on hyperlinking, which lawyers fear could have a “chilling effect”.

In GS Media (Case C-160/15), the ECJ ruled that hyperlinking to a copyrighted work published online without the owner’s consent is lawful as long as it is not for financial gain. The case arose after Sanoma, the Dutch publisher of Playboy magazine, commissioned a photoshoot with Britt Dekker, a reality TV star, and the photos were leaked to an Australian file sharing site. GS Media posted a hyperlink to a page on the Australian site where they could be downloaded. GS then refused Sanoma’s request to remove the hyperlink, and copyright infringement proceedings were brought.

The ECJ held that hyperlinking did not amount to a “communication to the public” of that work, as long as the person posting had no knowledge that the work was published illegally. However, there will be a rebuttable presumption that the person posting the link did have knowledge of its illegality where they posted the hyperlink for financial gain, as they would be presumed to have carried out the “necessary checks”.

Mark Owen, partner at Taylor Wessing, warned of a potential “chilling effect”. He said the rebuttable presumption was likely to be problematic. “On a basic level, national courts may struggle to import a knowledge test into cases relating to primary copyright infringement, since the question of intent (or negligence) is not usually relevant at the stage of considering whether there was an act of infringement in the first place”. Establishing “financial gain” raised practical difficulties where, for example, a personal website or blog carried some paid advertising but on a small-scale. It was also difficult to know what the ECJ meant by “necessary checks”. Tom Collins, associate at Stevens & Bolton, said: “For those sharing hyperlinks in a commercial context, there will now be an expectation to carry out checks to ensure that the content has not been illegally published. This will inevitably raise some practical difficulties for some online businesses.”

Issue: 7714 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll