header-logo header-logo

Hyperlinking copyrighted work lawful if not for profit

15 September 2016
Issue: 7714 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Owners of commercial websites face uncertainty following a landmark European Court of Justice (ECJ) decision on hyperlinking, which lawyers fear could have a “chilling effect”.

In GS Media (Case C-160/15), the ECJ ruled that hyperlinking to a copyrighted work published online without the owner’s consent is lawful as long as it is not for financial gain. The case arose after Sanoma, the Dutch publisher of Playboy magazine, commissioned a photoshoot with Britt Dekker, a reality TV star, and the photos were leaked to an Australian file sharing site. GS Media posted a hyperlink to a page on the Australian site where they could be downloaded. GS then refused Sanoma’s request to remove the hyperlink, and copyright infringement proceedings were brought.

The ECJ held that hyperlinking did not amount to a “communication to the public” of that work, as long as the person posting had no knowledge that the work was published illegally. However, there will be a rebuttable presumption that the person posting the link did have knowledge of its illegality where they posted the hyperlink for financial gain, as they would be presumed to have carried out the “necessary checks”.

Mark Owen, partner at Taylor Wessing, warned of a potential “chilling effect”. He said the rebuttable presumption was likely to be problematic. “On a basic level, national courts may struggle to import a knowledge test into cases relating to primary copyright infringement, since the question of intent (or negligence) is not usually relevant at the stage of considering whether there was an act of infringement in the first place”. Establishing “financial gain” raised practical difficulties where, for example, a personal website or blog carried some paid advertising but on a small-scale. It was also difficult to know what the ECJ meant by “necessary checks”. Tom Collins, associate at Stevens & Bolton, said: “For those sharing hyperlinks in a commercial context, there will now be an expectation to carry out checks to ensure that the content has not been illegally published. This will inevitably raise some practical difficulties for some online businesses.”

Issue: 7714 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll