header-logo header-logo

30 May 2014 / Penny Bygrave , Michael Twomey
Issue: 7608 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

I give you his word

web_twomey_2

Penny Bygrave & Michael Twomey examine instances of potential liability

In Cramaso LLP v Ogilvie- Grant, Earl of Seafield (Scotland) [2014] UKSC 9, [2014] 2 All ER 270 Sandy Lewis, an employee and chief executive of the defendant trust, caused an e-mail to be delivered to Alistair Erskine referring to a moor’s estimated grouse population. The e-mail contained implied false statements of fact that amounted to misrepresentations; the figures were extrapolated from counts relating to certain parts of the moor and were not representative of the moor as a whole. The Scottish lower court did not find fraudulent misrepresentation. Erskine subsequently decided to use a new limited liability partnership to enter into a lease of the moor. Discussions continued between Lewis and Erskine, who was then acting as agent of the LLP. Some weeks after the e-mail, the lease was eventually signed on behalf of the trust and the LLP.

In the Scottish Court of Session, the Lord Ordinary, Lord Hodge, found that Erskine was the directing mind and will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll