header-logo header-logo

ICO joins global warning on AI

The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has joined with 60 data protection authorities from around the world to call for ‘urgent regulatory attention’ to the dangers of artificial intelligence (AI)

Their joint statement on AI-generated imagery and the protection of privacy, issued this week, highlights harms such as the creation of non-consensual intimate imagery, defamatory depictions, and the cyber-bullying and exploitation of children and other vulnerable groups. The co-signatories urge organisations to follow fundamental principles such as implementing robust safeguards, particularly where children are depicted, and providing effective mechanisms for individuals seeking the removal of harmful content.

Co-signatory William Malcolm, ICO executive director of regulatory risk and innovation, called for ‘meaningful safeguards to ensure autonomy, transparency and control’.

Ian Jeffery, CEO of the Law Society, said: ‘Technology and AI knows no borders. Global cooperation is a necessity.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll