header-logo header-logo

04 December 2013
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

If disaster comes…

Partners “worryingly” unaware of consequences of insolvency

Law firm partners are “worryingly” unaware of the significant personal costs they could face if their firm ceases to trade without a successor practice in place.

Even though the current climate for law firms is tough, one out of two law firm partners do not know what financial losses they might incur in the event of insolvency, according to a new report by accountants Baker Tilly, The importance of being financially stable.

The report offers advice to partners on different ways to assess stability within their firm, and how to cope with an unplanned failure. Under law firm regulation, the firm itself is required to be financially stable yet the report uncovered a lack of understanding of how to gauge stability and what it really means, and the implications of regulatory intervention by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

The report suggests that law firms may in future want to retain more of their profits in the business, even though this is not tax-efficient.

George Bull, chair of Baker Tilly’s professional practices group, says: “There is a worrying lack of knowledge and understanding about the implications of a law firm falling into insolvency. 

“All possible steps should be taken to avoid an unplanned cessation of business which can be very costly for individual partners. However, all too often, partners don’t take action in time, either because they fail to pay sufficient attention to their cashflow, or because they wilfully bury their heads in the sand.”

In the last year, several well-known law firms have gone under, including Midlands firm Blakemores, which closed in March after an SRA intervention. National firm Cobbetts collapsed in January, and was later sold to DWF. Yorkshire firm Atteys was shut down by the SRA in March. In October, financially struggling Manches was bought in a “pre-pack administration” deal by Penningtons.

 

Issue: 7587 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll