header-logo header-logo

04 December 2013
Issue: 7587 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

If disaster comes…

Partners “worryingly” unaware of consequences of insolvency

Law firm partners are “worryingly” unaware of the significant personal costs they could face if their firm ceases to trade without a successor practice in place.

Even though the current climate for law firms is tough, one out of two law firm partners do not know what financial losses they might incur in the event of insolvency, according to a new report by accountants Baker Tilly, The importance of being financially stable.

The report offers advice to partners on different ways to assess stability within their firm, and how to cope with an unplanned failure. Under law firm regulation, the firm itself is required to be financially stable yet the report uncovered a lack of understanding of how to gauge stability and what it really means, and the implications of regulatory intervention by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

The report suggests that law firms may in future want to retain more of their profits in the business, even though this is not tax-efficient.

George Bull, chair of Baker Tilly’s professional practices group, says: “There is a worrying lack of knowledge and understanding about the implications of a law firm falling into insolvency. 

“All possible steps should be taken to avoid an unplanned cessation of business which can be very costly for individual partners. However, all too often, partners don’t take action in time, either because they fail to pay sufficient attention to their cashflow, or because they wilfully bury their heads in the sand.”

In the last year, several well-known law firms have gone under, including Midlands firm Blakemores, which closed in March after an SRA intervention. National firm Cobbetts collapsed in January, and was later sold to DWF. Yorkshire firm Atteys was shut down by the SRA in March. In October, financially struggling Manches was bought in a “pre-pack administration” deal by Penningtons.

 

Issue: 7587 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll