header-logo header-logo

06 January 2012 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7495 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

If life gives you lemons...

Roger Smith gets the juice on lemon law, landmarks & lectures

A leading American lawyer, Vince Megna, has protested against fee-limiting arrangements introduced in Wisconsin by refusing to act for any Republicans, the state’s majority party.

Megna is a familiar figure in the US profession, widely known as the “lemon law” king. Lemon law, as he helpfully explains on his website, is “the body of law that offers protection to owners of motor vehicles with recurring mechanical or other problems that are not resolved within a reasonable time by the dealer or manufacturer”. Megna has used the previously welcome provisions of Wisconsin jurisdiction to some effect. He obtained $385,000 from DaimlerChrysler for a defective Dodge Viper, $482,000 from Mercedes-Benz for a dud E class, and proudly claims to have got the better of General Motors over 700 times without a single loss.

The key to judgments of such magnitude is to persuade the court to apply a multiplier to damages. Mercedes paid about eight times the value of the car in question.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll