Illegal enforcement?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

18 July 2013 / Philip Kolvin KC

Issue: 7569 / Categories: Opinion , Commercial

printer

mail-detail

rexfeatures_356675a

The Soho sex shop case highlights the need for an urgent review of the licensing fee regime, says Philip Kolvin QC

A case which started out as a squabble over licence fees for Soho sex shops has the potential to affect fees for licences and other authorisations for all manner of service activities. The issue came to the fore in the ground-breaking judgment of the Court of Appeal in R (Hemming) v Westminster City Council [2013] EWCA Civ 591.

Hemming

The background to Hemming was that sex shops were paying Westminster City Council £29,102 per year for a sex establishment licence under the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982. The operators served freedom of information requests, replies to which revealed that the overwhelming bulk of their fees was being used to fund prosecutions of illegal operators.

After three years of litigation, the Court of Appeal, led by the Master of the Rolls Lord Dyson, ruled that basing licence fees on such enforcement costs was illegal. It falls foul of the Services Directive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Illegal enforcement?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

rexfeatures_356675a

The Soho sex shop case highlights the need for an urgent review of the licensing fee regime, says Philip Kolvin QC

A case which started out as a squabble over licence fees for Soho sex shops has the potential to affect fees for licences and other authorisations for all manner of service activities. The issue came to the fore in the ground-breaking judgment of the Court of Appeal in R (Hemming) v Westminster City Council [2013] EWCA Civ 591.

Hemming

The background to Hemming was that sex shops were paying Westminster City Council £29,102 per year for a sex establishment licence under the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1982. The operators served freedom of information requests, replies to which revealed that the overwhelming bulk of their fees was being used to fund prosecutions of illegal operators.

After three years of litigation, the Court of Appeal, led by the Master of the Rolls Lord Dyson, ruled that basing licence fees on such enforcement costs was illegal. It falls foul of the Services Directive

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS

Public Accounts Committee warn of ‘extinction’ risk for legal aid

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned

NLJ this week: The insider returns

Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome

NLJ this week: Drawing the line on contempt

After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights

NLJ this week: Stop and search by the numbers

The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains

NLJ this week: Looking back on the prorogation that never was

Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously

back-to-top-scroll