header-logo header-logo

19 July 2023
Issue: 8034 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Illegal Migration Act branded ‘senselessly cruel’

The Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ILPA) has joined a coalition of 290 lawyers, justice, immigration, housing, legal advice and rights groups to collectively condemn the passing of the Illegal Migration Act 2023.

The Act creates a duty to detain and remove to Rwanda or another country deemed safe by the government persons arriving in the UK by an unauthorised route such as by a small boat, regardless of whether they claim asylum.

The coalition includes Liberty, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, the Law Centres Network, the Public Law Project, SMK Law Solicitors and Rights of Women.

Their statement calls the legislation a ‘senselessly cruel Act’ which ‘will have a devastating impact on people’s lives. It turns our country’s back on people seeking safety, blocking them from protection, support, and justice at a time they need it most’.

They warn the Act ‘risks breaching multiple international human rights treaties including the Refugee Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights while shielding the government from accountability.

‘The UK government has admitted that it cannot confirm if the Act is compatible with the UK’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. The Act will force people into situations that threaten their lives—whether by placing children in detention or sending people off to countries where their lives might be at grave risk’.

The statement continues: ‘In stripping the most basic rights from people seeking safety and a better life, the Act dismantles human rights protections for all of us.’

The Act passed this week following a round of ping-pong between the two Houses of Parliament, after peers withdrew or were defeated on amendments intended to install 72-hour limits on the detention of children, modern slavery protections and exemptions for trafficking victims, and to ensure compliance with international human rights treaties. Peers also withdrew amendments preventing the removal of LGBT people to certain countries, and imposing a duty on the home secretary to create safe and legal routes to the UK for refugees.

Concessions granted by the government included that unaccompanied children will be granted bail after eight days in detention, and that pregnant women cannot be detained for more than 72 hours without ministerial authorisation.

The Bibby Stockholm, a barge that can house up to 500 asylum seekers, docked at Portland, Dorset on the morning after the legislation passed.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll