header-logo header-logo

19 July 2023
Issue: 8034 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Illegal Migration Act branded ‘senselessly cruel’

The Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association (ILPA) has joined a coalition of 290 lawyers, justice, immigration, housing, legal advice and rights groups to collectively condemn the passing of the Illegal Migration Act 2023.

The Act creates a duty to detain and remove to Rwanda or another country deemed safe by the government persons arriving in the UK by an unauthorised route such as by a small boat, regardless of whether they claim asylum.

The coalition includes Liberty, the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants, the Law Centres Network, the Public Law Project, SMK Law Solicitors and Rights of Women.

Their statement calls the legislation a ‘senselessly cruel Act’ which ‘will have a devastating impact on people’s lives. It turns our country’s back on people seeking safety, blocking them from protection, support, and justice at a time they need it most’.

They warn the Act ‘risks breaching multiple international human rights treaties including the Refugee Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights while shielding the government from accountability.

‘The UK government has admitted that it cannot confirm if the Act is compatible with the UK’s obligations under the European Convention on Human Rights. The Act will force people into situations that threaten their lives—whether by placing children in detention or sending people off to countries where their lives might be at grave risk’.

The statement continues: ‘In stripping the most basic rights from people seeking safety and a better life, the Act dismantles human rights protections for all of us.’

The Act passed this week following a round of ping-pong between the two Houses of Parliament, after peers withdrew or were defeated on amendments intended to install 72-hour limits on the detention of children, modern slavery protections and exemptions for trafficking victims, and to ensure compliance with international human rights treaties. Peers also withdrew amendments preventing the removal of LGBT people to certain countries, and imposing a duty on the home secretary to create safe and legal routes to the UK for refugees.

Concessions granted by the government included that unaccompanied children will be granted bail after eight days in detention, and that pregnant women cannot be detained for more than 72 hours without ministerial authorisation.

The Bibby Stockholm, a barge that can house up to 500 asylum seekers, docked at Portland, Dorset on the morning after the legislation passed.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll