header-logo header-logo

13 January 2011
Issue: 7448 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Immigration

Carvalho v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Omar v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWCA Civ 1406, [2010] All ER (D) 166 (Dec)

Council Directive (EC) 64/221 (on the co-ordination of special measures concerning the movement and residence of foreign nationals which are justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health) required that measures taken on grounds of public policy or public security should be based exclusively on the personal conduct of the individual concerned and that previous convictions should not, in themselves, constitute grounds for the taking of such measures.

It did not follow that the same approach was to be applied to the acquisition of the new right of residence under the Council Directive (EC) 2004/38 (on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States) (the Citizens’ Directive). It was particularly important that the quality of residence required during the five years was such as to meet the objective of the Citizens’ Directive to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

DWF—11 appointments

DWF—11 appointments

DWF strengthens North West teams with 11 newly qualified solicitors

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll