header-logo header-logo

23 March 2012
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration

Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 260, [2012] All ER (D) 88 (Mar)

It was established that the service of a notice under s 120 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 was in the discretion of the secretary of state. He was not obliged to take that step and would presumably do so only if he was content that the tribunal should consider any matters put forward in response to it. Although good and efficient administration was furthered by the service of a s 120 notice, that was not a good or sufficient reason to do violence to the statutory wording and impose a duty where Parliament had clearly not done so. As the secretary of state was not under a duty to serve a s 120 notice the fact that he did not do so could not render an immigration decision unlawful. An applicant on whom no s 120 notice had been served could not raise before the tribunal any ground for the grant of leave to remain different from that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
Careless client checks do not automatically make a solicitor dishonest, but deliberately avoiding confirmation of suspected wrongdoing can cross the line
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
back-to-top-scroll