header-logo header-logo

Immigration

23 March 2012
Issue: 7506 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Lamichhane v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 260, [2012] All ER (D) 88 (Mar)

It was established that the service of a notice under s 120 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 was in the discretion of the secretary of state. He was not obliged to take that step and would presumably do so only if he was content that the tribunal should consider any matters put forward in response to it. Although good and efficient administration was furthered by the service of a s 120 notice, that was not a good or sufficient reason to do violence to the statutory wording and impose a duty where Parliament had clearly not done so. As the secretary of state was not under a duty to serve a s 120 notice the fact that he did not do so could not render an immigration decision unlawful. An applicant on whom no s 120 notice had been served could not raise before the tribunal any ground for the grant of leave to remain different from that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Leadership strengthened across core practice areas with nine new partners

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Real estate team welcomes partner inBirmingham

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Firm strengthens commitment to nurturing future legal talent

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll