header-logo header-logo

Immigration

12 April 2013
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Nagre) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 720 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 15 (Apr)

There was full coverage of an individual’s rights under Art 8 of the Convention in all cases by a combination of the new immigration rules (as set out in the Statement of Changes laid on 13 June 2012 (HC 194)) and under the secretary of state’s residual discretion to grant leave to remain outside the Rules. Consequent upon that feature of the overall legal framework, there was no legal requirement that the new rules themselves provided for leave to remain to be granted under the Rules in every case where Art 8 of the Convention gave rise to a good claim for an individual to be allowed to remain. That had always been the position in relation to the operation of the regime of immigration control prior to the introduction of the new rules, and the introduction of the new rules had not changed those basic features of the regime

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll