header-logo header-logo

12 April 2013
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration

R (on the application of Nagre) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 720 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 15 (Apr)

There was full coverage of an individual’s rights under Art 8 of the Convention in all cases by a combination of the new immigration rules (as set out in the Statement of Changes laid on 13 June 2012 (HC 194)) and under the secretary of state’s residual discretion to grant leave to remain outside the Rules. Consequent upon that feature of the overall legal framework, there was no legal requirement that the new rules themselves provided for leave to remain to be granted under the Rules in every case where Art 8 of the Convention gave rise to a good claim for an individual to be allowed to remain. That had always been the position in relation to the operation of the regime of immigration control prior to the introduction of the new rules, and the introduction of the new rules had not changed those basic features of the regime

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll