header-logo header-logo

Immigration

12 April 2013
Issue: 7555 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

R (on the application of Nagre) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2013] EWHC 720 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 15 (Apr)

There was full coverage of an individual’s rights under Art 8 of the Convention in all cases by a combination of the new immigration rules (as set out in the Statement of Changes laid on 13 June 2012 (HC 194)) and under the secretary of state’s residual discretion to grant leave to remain outside the Rules. Consequent upon that feature of the overall legal framework, there was no legal requirement that the new rules themselves provided for leave to remain to be granted under the Rules in every case where Art 8 of the Convention gave rise to a good claim for an individual to be allowed to remain. That had always been the position in relation to the operation of the regime of immigration control prior to the introduction of the new rules, and the introduction of the new rules had not changed those basic features of the regime

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

NEWS
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
Early determination is no longer a novelty in arbitration. In NLJ this week, Gustavo Moser, arbitration specialist lawyer at Lexis+, charts the global embrace of summary disposal powers, now embedded in the Arbitration Act 1996 and mirrored worldwide. Tribunals may swiftly dismiss claims with ‘no real prospect of succeeding’, but only if fairness is preserved
The Ministry of Justice is once again in the dock as access to justice continues to deteriorate. NLJ consultant editor David Greene warns in this week's issue that neither public legal aid nor private litigation funding looks set for a revival in 2026
Civil justice lurches onward with characteristic eccentricity. In his latest Civil Way column, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist, surveys a procedural landscape featuring 19-page bundle rules, digital possession claims, and rent laws he labels ‘bonkers’
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
back-to-top-scroll