header-logo header-logo

Immigration

23 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Khan v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 424, [2017] All ER (D) 75 (Jun)

The Court of Appeal allowed the appellant Pakistani national’s asylum seeker’s appeal in relation to a dismissal by the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (the UT) of an application for judicial review on the basis that there was an alternative remedy by way of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). The UT had erred in deciding that the existence of an alternative remedy was not determinative in the exercise of discretion. Cumulatively, the circumstances meant that it not only could but should have gone on to determine the jurisdiction issue itself. It could have done so while still maintaining that in general the jurisdiction issue should be determined in the first instance by the FTT.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll