header-logo header-logo

Immigration

23 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Khan v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 424, [2017] All ER (D) 75 (Jun)

The Court of Appeal allowed the appellant Pakistani national’s asylum seeker’s appeal in relation to a dismissal by the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (the UT) of an application for judicial review on the basis that there was an alternative remedy by way of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). The UT had erred in deciding that the existence of an alternative remedy was not determinative in the exercise of discretion. Cumulatively, the circumstances meant that it not only could but should have gone on to determine the jurisdiction issue itself. It could have done so while still maintaining that in general the jurisdiction issue should be determined in the first instance by the FTT.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
The next generation is inheriting more than assets—it is inheriting complexity. Writing in NLJ this week, experts from Penningtons Manches Cooper chart how global mobility, blended families and evolving values are reshaping private wealth advice
back-to-top-scroll