header-logo header-logo

23 June 2017
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration

Khan v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] EWCA Civ 424, [2017] All ER (D) 75 (Jun)

The Court of Appeal allowed the appellant Pakistani national’s asylum seeker’s appeal in relation to a dismissal by the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (the UT) of an application for judicial review on the basis that there was an alternative remedy by way of appeal to the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber). The UT had erred in deciding that the existence of an alternative remedy was not determinative in the exercise of discretion. Cumulatively, the circumstances meant that it not only could but should have gone on to determine the jurisdiction issue itself. It could have done so while still maintaining that in general the jurisdiction issue should be determined in the first instance by the FTT.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten Muchin Rosenman—Charlotte Hill

Katten strengthens financial markets and funds group in London

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James—Keith Cundall & Lee Hart

Hugh James expands national Serious Injury team with two new Partners

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW—Rémi Ducloyer

HFW continues Paris office growth with public law Partner hire

NEWS
The Court of Appeal's decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP has lifted months of uncertainty for Chartered Legal Executives while prompting a rethink of regulation and supervision
The assisted dying debate returns to Westminster as Lauren Edwards MP reintroduces legislation that stalled in the House of Lords last session despite clearing the Commons
A little-noticed provision of the Crime and Policing Act 2026 has fundamentally expanded corporate criminal liability
Artificial intelligence is transforming legal practice, but careless reliance on it is creating growing professional risks
The law offers cohabiting couples surprisingly greater protection after one partner dies than when they separate during life
back-to-top-scroll