header-logo header-logo

03 November 2017
Issue: 7768 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Immigration

R (on the application of Anjum) v Entry Clearance Officer, Islamabad (entrepreneur – business expansion – fairness generally) [2017] UKUT 406 (IAC), [2017] All ER (D) 145 (Aug)

Where a Tier 1 applicant operated an existing business, the Immigration Rules, particularly paras 245D and 245DB, did not prohibit the use of part of the minimum fund to purchase a second business for the purpose of developing and expanding the existing enterprise. Accordingly, the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) quashed the defendant Entry Clearance Officer’s decision, refusing the claimant Pakistani national’s application for a Tier 1 (Entrepreneur) visa and the Entry Clearance Manager’s affirmation of that decision. NLJ

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll