header-logo header-logo

27 March 2019
Issue: 7834 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights , EU
printer mail-detail

Immigration Bill human rights warning

The Immigration Bill removes the rights of EU citizens in the UK after Brexit with no guarantee of replacement, MPs and Peers have warned.

In its current version, the Bill provides that it will be up to the Home Secretary to reinstate these rights via secondary legislation. In a report published this week, the Human Rights Committee contends that this leaves families in too precarious a situation regarding their housing, social security and other free movement rights. They propose a series of amendments to enshrine protections and guarantees in the Bill.

Harriet Harman MP, the Committee’s Chair, said: ‘EU citizens living in this country right now will be understandably anxious about their futures.

‘We’re talking about the rights of people who have resided in the UK for years, decades even, paying into our social security system or even having been born in the UK and lived here their whole lives. When it comes to rights, promising that everything will be worked out in the future is not good enough, it must be a guarantee, which is why the Committee have reinserted rights guarantees back into the wording of the Bill.’

The Committee also raises concerns about the lack of physical proof of status given to individuals registering under the EU Settlement Scheme. It says that, unless the Home Office ensures physical proof is provided, individuals could suffer problems similar to those endured by the Windrush generation.

It argues that the rights of individuals who may have lived and worked in the UK their whole lives should not depend on their registering with a scheme within a specific time limit.

The Committee also wants to UK and Irish governments to clarify the rights of Irish citizens post-Brexit, with a view to continuing existing arrangements.

Issue: 7834 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Birketts—Nathan Evans

Commercial and technology team in Cambridgestrengthened by partner hire

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Andrew & Andrew Solicitors—Shikha Datta

Hampshire firm appoints head of new family department

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Latham & Watkins—Sarah Lightdale

Firm strengthens securities practice with partner return

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll