header-logo header-logo

27 March 2019
Issue: 7834 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights , EU
printer mail-detail

Immigration Bill human rights warning

The Immigration Bill removes the rights of EU citizens in the UK after Brexit with no guarantee of replacement, MPs and Peers have warned.

In its current version, the Bill provides that it will be up to the Home Secretary to reinstate these rights via secondary legislation. In a report published this week, the Human Rights Committee contends that this leaves families in too precarious a situation regarding their housing, social security and other free movement rights. They propose a series of amendments to enshrine protections and guarantees in the Bill.

Harriet Harman MP, the Committee’s Chair, said: ‘EU citizens living in this country right now will be understandably anxious about their futures.

‘We’re talking about the rights of people who have resided in the UK for years, decades even, paying into our social security system or even having been born in the UK and lived here their whole lives. When it comes to rights, promising that everything will be worked out in the future is not good enough, it must be a guarantee, which is why the Committee have reinserted rights guarantees back into the wording of the Bill.’

The Committee also raises concerns about the lack of physical proof of status given to individuals registering under the EU Settlement Scheme. It says that, unless the Home Office ensures physical proof is provided, individuals could suffer problems similar to those endured by the Windrush generation.

It argues that the rights of individuals who may have lived and worked in the UK their whole lives should not depend on their registering with a scheme within a specific time limit.

The Committee also wants to UK and Irish governments to clarify the rights of Irish citizens post-Brexit, with a view to continuing existing arrangements.

Issue: 7834 / Categories: Legal News , Immigration & asylum , Human rights , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll