header-logo header-logo

Impeachment matters

22 September 2017 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Athelstane Aamodt provides a master class in impeachment at home & abroad

Daniel Kammen, the US State Department’s Science Envoy, sent a letter of resignation to President Donald Trump last month. The first letter at the beginning of each paragraph of his letter spelt out the acrostic ‘IMPEACH’. There have been various calls from President Trump’s opponents for him to be impeached.

What is impeachment? How often has it been used? And does the same thing exist here in the UK?

The impeachment of a US President is governed, as you would expect, by the United States Constitution. The House of Representatives has the exclusive power to decide whether to impeach or not (‘impeachment’ is technically the process whereby the House formally charges someone with an offence). If the House votes by a simple majority on a resolution to impeach on a charge then the Senate will hear the trial which is presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (famously, during Bill Clinton’s impeachment hearing in 1999, the then Chief Justice William Rehnquist

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll