header-logo header-logo

22 September 2017 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Features , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Impeachment matters

Athelstane Aamodt provides a master class in impeachment at home & abroad

Daniel Kammen, the US State Department’s Science Envoy, sent a letter of resignation to President Donald Trump last month. The first letter at the beginning of each paragraph of his letter spelt out the acrostic ‘IMPEACH’. There have been various calls from President Trump’s opponents for him to be impeached.

What is impeachment? How often has it been used? And does the same thing exist here in the UK?

The impeachment of a US President is governed, as you would expect, by the United States Constitution. The House of Representatives has the exclusive power to decide whether to impeach or not (‘impeachment’ is technically the process whereby the House formally charges someone with an offence). If the House votes by a simple majority on a resolution to impeach on a charge then the Senate will hear the trial which is presided over by the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court (famously, during Bill Clinton’s impeachment hearing in 1999, the then Chief Justice William Rehnquist

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll