header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
17 June 2022 / Michael Orlick
Issue: 7983 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Highways
printer mail-detail

Imposing traffic controls on private roads

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
84985
Michael Orlik looks at the rules of private roads
  • Includes caselaw on residents’ rights concerning traffic on private roads.

NLJ published in a July 2020 issue, an article by me which considered the statutory definition of ‘road’. The Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 enables local authorities to make orders imposing parking restrictions on a road. Section 142 in the Act provides: ‘road’ ‘means any length of highway or of any other road to which the public has access’.

In R ex p Preeti Pereira and Environment and Traffic Adjudicators and London Borough of Southwark, [2020] EWHC 811 (Admin), [2020] All ER (D) 95 (Apr) discussed in the article, the High Court Judge held that, unless the access was lawful, the public did not have access. On the facts of that case, he found the public had not enjoyed lawful access, hence the parking restriction order was of no effect. Many private roads are ungated and nobody thinks of stopping the public from using them,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll